In win for Jordan, judge denies Bragg's request to block GOP congressional subpoena

The Manhattan district attorney's office said it'll seek a stay pending appeal.

A federal judge has denied Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's request to block a congressional subpoena for a former prosecutor in Bragg's office who investigated former President Donald Trump.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on Wednesday declined to enjoin the subpoena for testimony about Trump's indictment, clearing the way for Mark Pomerantz to be interviewed privately Thursday before the House Judiciary Committee.

Pomerantz was a special assistant district attorney who resigned in 2022 over Bragg's unwillingness to pursue a case against Trump. After Pomerantz left Bragg's office, he wrote a memoir about his experience, telling ABC News in February he felt "strongly you do have to apply the same legal standards to everyone, regardless of your president or pauper."

PHOTO: Rep. Jim Jordan, speaks during a House Select Subcommittee hearing on the Coronavirus pandemic investigation of the origins of COVID-19, Apr. 18, 2023, in Washington.
Rep. Jim Jordan, speaks during a House Select Subcommittee hearing on the Coronavirus pandemic investigation of the origins of COVID-19, Apr. 18, 2023, in Washington.
Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP

The subpoena seeking testimony from Pomerantz is the first to be issued by the Republican-controlled committee. Bragg has sued the GOP chairman, Rep. Jim Jordan, over the congressional probe, calling it a "transparent campaign to intimidate and attack" the office.

The decision is a win for Jordan, a Trump ally who subpoenaed Pomerantz as part of what he's claimed is a probe into whether Bragg's office used federal funds in the investigation of the former president.

PHOTO: Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg speaks to reporters during a news conference at police headquarters, Apr. 18, 2023, in New York.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg speaks to reporters during a news conference at police headquarters, Apr. 18, 2023, in New York.
Mary Altaffer/AP

MORE: House Judiciary chair subpoenas former prosecutor on Trump's criminal case

Bragg's office immediately said it was seeking a stay of the judge's decision.

"We respectfully disagree with the District Court's decision and are seeking a stay pending appeal," said a spokesperson.

PHOTO: Attorney Mark Pomerantz arrives at Federal Court in New York, Aug. 12, 2002.
Attorney Mark Pomerantz arrives at Federal Court in New York, Aug. 12, 2002.
David Karp/AP, File

MORE: Manhattan DA sues GOP's Jim Jordan as feud escalates over Trump's prosecution

"In our federalist system, elected state and federal actors sometimes engage in political dogfights," Vyskocil said in her ruling. "The Court does not endorse either side's agenda. The sole question before the Court at this time is whether Bragg has a legal basis to quash a congressional subpoena that was issued with a valid legislative purpose. He does not."

"It is not the role of the federal judiciary to dictate what legislation Congress may consider or how it should conduct its deliberations in that connection. Mr. Pomerantz must appear for the congressional deposition. No one is above the law," Vyskocil's decision said.

The judge urged Bragg and Jordan to "reach a mutually agreeable compromise" about the deposition of Pomerantz, which is scheduled for 10 a.m. Thursday in Washington, D.C.

A spokesperson for Jordan celebrated the judge's ruling.

"Today's decision shows that Congress has the ability to conduct oversight and issue subpoenas to people like Mark Pomeranz, and we look forward to his deposition before the Judiciary Committee," said spokesman Russell Dye.

ABC News' Katherine Faulders contributed to this report.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A combat F-14 Tomcat aircraft The American Navy adored them

Arsenal vs Man City - Community Shield: TV channel, team news, lineups & prediction